Here at ISO 3200, we'd recommend stopping right at 30 x 40 inches; any larger and noise might become an issue. Here at ISO 6400, the Fuji continues to produce a noticeably cleaner, crisper and more detailed JPEG than the Pentax with a tighter noise grain and better color as well, but again that's mostly due to better processing from the Fuji as RAW files contain similar noise characteristics. An 11 x 14 inch print just passes muster, which is still quite remarkable. When it comes to focus accuracy, I found both cameras to be similar – most images turn out to be very sharp in the areas where the focus point was aimed at, which is great news. A detailed list of camera specifications is available at Fujifim.com. Both show similar levels of noise, however the Fuji's grain pattern is a bit more regular and film-like. GFX has a sensor that is approximately 1.7 times the size of a 35mm full frame. At ISO 51,200, the Fuji GFX 50S takes the crown as king of the 8 x 10 inch print! Many seem to prefer a tilt adapter that allows the EVF to be used in different angles. Throughout this ISO range, prints are super crisp with tons of resolution, and colors are pleasing and nicely saturated. Fujifilm GFX 50S with GF 23mm f/4, GF 32-64mm f/4, GF 45mm f/2.8 & GF 110mm f/2 Early morning landscape The GFX’s ‘cropped’ 43.8×32.9mm sensor offers 68% more surface area compared to the D850’s 35.9×23.9mm full frame chip. I have been fortunate to have used all three systems, so everything I say in this review is based on my extensive experience with each camera. The images, when viewed through the LCD screen and then on my iMac, are probably the best I have seen in terms of image quality . FotodioX Nikon F to Fuji GFX 50S Adapter Review, Z6 II vs. Z7 II – advice on which one better for enthusiast level, To watermark or not to watermark on prints, Full-Frame is 236% as large as APS-C and typically 2x-4x as expensive, Medium Format Small (Fuji GFX 50S, Pentax 645Z and Hasselblad X1D-50c) is 167% as large as full-frame and typically 3x-4x as expensive, Medium Format Large (Hasselblad H6D-100c) is 149% as large as Medium Format Small and 3x-4x as expensive, Extended ISO Sensitivity: 50, 25,600-102,400, Electronic Shutter: 60 minutes to 1/16000, Viewfinder: 3.69M-dot OLED Color Viewfinder, Autofocus System: Contrast Detection Only, LCD Screen: 3.2 inch, Approx. It combines outstanding resolution of 51.4 megapixels with exceptional tones, advanced color reproduction and high-performance lenses. ISO 6400 images display slightly stronger noise, but they maintain a film-like graininess, which isn't overly detrimental to print quality. This is particularly evident in the red-leaf swatch which has become noticeably softer with much of the fine thread pattern blurred away. Contrast in the red-leaf swatch does however remain better from the Canon. The “Drive” modes on the GFX 50S are moved to a small button to the right of the shutter speed dial, while a tiny button on the bottom left of the top LCD is there to reverse the colors of the LCD when shooting in dark conditions. There is aliasing in all of the images, so the lens should be plenty sharp enough. While the Phase One XF continues to readily out-resolve the GFX here at ISO 1600, its resolution advantage isn't nearly as great as at base ISO. Aside from the above, the rest of the functionality on the GFX 50S is very similar to that of X-series cameras. One has to either press the buttons and experiment with them to see what they do or dig in the camera menu to find the answers. The priority has always been to achieve premium image quality. For example, the Fuji GFX 50S’s pixel size is 5.3µ, whereas the Nikon D810 has a pixel size of 4.88µ. Both issues have been addressed via firmware updates and I can confirm that they indeed take care of these problems. February 6, 2020 By JimK 8 Comments. The Sony shows much higher contrast in our red-leaf swatch and still shows more moiré patterns, however most of the fine thread pattern has been blurred away by noise reduction. Noise in flatter areas is more visible from the Phase One already here at base ISO though, even at its lower base sensitivity of 50. The GFX 50S has been a big hit for Fujifilm, so the new camera comes as a bit of a surprise, being basically a repackaged 50S – it features the same sensor and processing engine and almost identical specifications, albeit housed in a sleeker, rangefinder-style body. Fujifilm GFX 50S GF 32-64mm F4 R LM WR Lens, f/13, /1/125th sec, ISO 200 Some additional pictures of the Fujifilm GFX XΩ modular medium format mirrorless camera prototype that was presented during the recent X Summit.This specific design never reached production because the shutter mechanism was too large: “Here are the three main modules – a grip component, the main body of the camera, and a removable EVF. bigger. However, if the strap is down, you will need to move it upwards to access the side doors. One should understand that moving up to “medium format” can differ quite a bit depending on what size of medium format sensor one chooses. The right side of the camera hosts a single door to access the dual SD ports. Despite this one inconvenience, I love the fact that Fuji made the strap easily removable, which is a great benefit in situations where it needs to be quickly detached and put away, such as when shooting on a tripod in windy conditions. Ahead of our full review, here are some sample images taken with a final production version of the brand new Fujifilm GFX 50S medium format camera, using the GF 23mm f/4, 45mm f/2.8, 63mm f/2.8 and 110mm f/2 lenses. Both cameras show some aliasing artifacts but the difference in resolution happens to make moiré patterns more visible from the Sony in our red-leaf swatch. GF23mm F4 GF45mm F2.8 GF63mm F2.8 GF110mm F2 GF120mm F4 Macro GF250mm F4 GF32-64mm F4 GFX 50S GFX 50R GFX 100 While the Hasselblad X1D-50c is made to appeal photographers of any level, the GFX 50S prioritizes functionality over design, so it’s aimed at enthusiasts and professionals who know what they are doing. And since Fuji did not want to make the camera any taller than a DSLR, the decision was made to extend the back of the camera. When customizing the top LCD, there are a total of 8 slots that you can set up in 5 lines and there are plenty of options for each slot. 100% crop. Still, at the end of the day, image quality differences might not matter in the long run – it mainly boils down to differences in camera systems. Although on paper the Fuji has just a slightly higher resolution (51.1MP with a 8256 x 6192 pixel image versus 50.3MP with a 8688 x 5702 image for the Canon), when framed vertically the 4:3 Fuji has a larger advantage over the 3:2 Canon in terms of resolving power than their relative pixel counts would imply. Besides that, it has a terrible design, which is improved a great part with the new Fujifilm GFX 100. Both cameras produce very pleasing colors as we've come to expect from Canon and Fuji. During the one day event we tried the GFX 50s in a few different scenarios, and want to share some early impressions, as well as some of the images that we took during the event. The Sony continues to produce better contrast in our troublesome red-leaf swatch, however fine detail is more distorted than the Fuji's. Both cameras blur our troublesome red-lead swatch, but the GFX holds on to a bit more detail. At the maximum expanded ISO of 102,400, however, images are a bit too noisy for our taste, and this ISO should be avoided for quality prints. Keep in mind this is with default settings, so it's possible with some careful processing the added resolution provided by the 100MP will allow you to apply stronger noise reduction while still retaining better detail, but the Fuji still comes out ahead in terms of noise when you simply resample the Phase One image down to the same 51 megapixel size. For those interested in working with the RAW files involved: click these links to visit each camera's respective sample image thumbnail page: Fuji GFX 50S, Canon 5DS R, Pentax 645Z, Phase One XF 100MP and Sony A7R Mark II -- links to the RAW files appear beneath those for the JPEG images, wherever we have them. On the GFX 50S, there is now an option called “Save Self-Timer Setting” in the Shooting Menu, which once turned on (off by default), will always save the Self-Timer state. The Fuji has also lost some subtle detail in the red-leaf fabric, though not to the same extent. However, for those who want to have the best image quality and do not mind the much higher price premium, medium format cameras certainly do have an edge over full-frame cameras. The bulk of the space is occupied by the massive lens throat, which has an impressive diameter of 65mm (slightly larger than that of the Hasselblad X1D-50c). However most of the difference is due to better JPEG processing from the Fuji, as noise levels in RAW files appear very similar. The Phase One's image is much grainier and default noise reduction distorts fine detail and edges more than the GFX. As expected, both show some aliasing artifacts. Additional notes regarding these and the recently announced Fuji GF lenses can be found in the next few pages. The Phase One XF 100 MP also renders a much sharper image, while at the same time producing fewer sharpening halos around high-contrast edges. Once the camera powered up and EVF turned on, it would display white horizontal blocks. Imaging Resource © 1998 - 2020. Here, Fuji kept things rather simple. The Fuji's image appears crisper due to more sophisticated default processing and perhaps a slightly better lens, and it has more pleasing, accurate colors as well. Both cameras show some aliasing artifacts but that is to be expected from cameras without optical low-pass filters. I am definitely not a big fan of such a tiny EC button, which makes it practically impossible to use it with gloves on. The XF easily out-resolves the 51-megapixel GFX 50S as expected, reproducing the finest of details the Fuji simply cannot. The X1D-50c has a total of 35 usable focus points, whereas the Fuji GFX 50S can go all the way to 425 focus points, so Fuji definitely comes out on top there. The VG-GFX1 vertical battery grip allows easier shooting in vertical orientation and you can double the battery capacity of the camera by inserting an additional NP-T125 battery into the grip. It’s certainly miles ahead of your average five-hundred-buck full frame camera lens. While jumping from an APS-C sensor to medium-format would be huge, moving up from full-frame to medium format is not going to show night and day differences in image quality. This would have removed the necessity to make the camera appear so bulky when compared to the Hasselblad X1D-50c. I doubt anyone who is serious about video would even consider a medium format camera, since the readout speed is simply insufficient to be able to push so much bandwidth through. Lastly, the GFX 50S also allows attaching a battery grip, something you cannot do on the Hasselblad X1D-50c. Considering that UHS-II SD cards are much faster compared to UHS-I cards and they will soon become the standard, Hasselblad definitely goofed up by limiting both ports to UHS-I on the high-end X1D-50c. While the three medium format cameras technically have more resolution than any other full-frame camera on the market (the closest in resolution is the Canon 5DS / 5DS R), it is not the resolution, but the sensor size that plays a huge role in the overall image quality of a system. I wish Fuji made it bigger and moved it away from the shutter release a little so that it is much easier to access. At this print size, noise is surprisingly well-controlled and the print has lots of detail throughout. The Phase One image is crisper and contrast remains higher in the red-leaf swatch, though, however color is better from the Fuji. This is another area where the GFX 50S stands above the Hasselblad X1D-50c – both ports are UHS-II compatible. Never before have we had a camera capable of a usable 8 x 10 inch print at this ISO setting. Fujifilm GFX 50R JPEG Images However, Fuji claims that it “customized” the GFX 50S sensor to yield superior image quality, which is not something one can easily see, but something that can be proven via detailed image comparisons that you can find in the Image Quality page of this review. Here we compare the medium format Fuji GFX 50S with the full-frame Canon 5DS R at base ISO. Ability to attach/detach EVF and other accessories using the flash socket is a great idea, especially if Fuji is planning to release additional accessories and offer future EVF upgrades. In fact, compared to the Hasselblad X1D-50c, one could argue that it is a pretty ugly camera and I would not disagree. Here at ISO 1600, the Fuji produces a noticeably cleaner, crisper and brighter image even though amount of detail preserved is still comparable. ISO 102,400 images, alas, finally hit a point of too much noise and too little detail for us to consider acceptable. Personally, I love the way Fuji designed its menu system. The series starts here. Previously, if one set a self-timer, then turned the camera off and back on, the self-timer would turn off, forcing one to set it back again. The Fuji GFX 50S and Pentax 645Z use very similar if not identical sensors, so it's no surprise they both resolve very similar levels of detail. As ISO rises, the GFX displays excellent noise control, with a very gradual increase in noise; and the noise that we can see is very finely-grained, almost film-like. The Fuji continues to produce better colors. ISO 50 through 1600 images are stunningly detailed with amazingly clean noise characteristics as ISO rises, making the medium-format GFX capable of producing crisp, clear prints all the way up to 30 x 40 inches. The Fuji GFX 50S image is dramatically cleaner than the Phase One image here at ISO 3200, with fewer noise reduction artifacts. Sharpening halos are practically nonexistent from the Sony, but they aren't very obtrusive from the GFX. Below ISO 3200, you could make even larger prints, but we hit the limit of our testing size. To learn more about what we’re about, please explore Innovation at the Fujifilm global website. Second, Fuji decided not to put any labels on the three function buttons, which is not something I would like to see on any camera. When it comes to the overall sensor size, it is also important to point out the physical size difference between the above-mentioned cameras: As you can see, moving up in sensor size costs a huge premium and the larger you go, the less value you get. This obviously would require Fuji to redesign the EVF to be shorter in length and possibly increase the vertical size of the camera (since the EVF would have to be made a bit taller), but I would rather have a slightly taller, but slim camera, than one that is even deeper than my Nikon DSLRs. (Note that the Canon was shot with Fine Detail Picture Style which does a better job rendering fine detail without visible sharpening artifacts than Canon's Standard Picture Style, but images also have lower contrast.) The “edgy” retro look of the camera, along with the extruded LCD just don’t look good on such a large camera body in my opinion. This menu option is currently exclusive to the GFX 50S, but it should be provided in firmware updates to all other X-series cameras! The Fuji GFX's image quality continues to pull away from the Canon 5DS R's at ISO 3200, with a much cleaner, crisper, more detailed image all around. The Fujifilm GFX 50R is a medium format camera with 51.4 million pixels, backed up by an amazing lineup of Fujifilm GF lenses… so there is obviously no doubt about the image quality. A stunning print quality performance from the GFX! Speaking of firmware, I am glad that Fuji finally fixed another serious bug – inability to save the Self-Timer state! I have been shooting with the GFX 50S since it was released, so the experience that I am sharing with our readers is based on quite a bit of fieldwork, including international travel. You can customize the camera in many ways and there are plenty of other useful options, such as the ability to map out hot / stuck pixels. Fujifilm has continuously pursued image quality as a leading photographic manufacturer. As a result, the Fuji does resolve a bit more detail in this comparison, but it also applies stronger default sharpening and contrast producing a crisper image with more "pop," though with slightly more noticeable sharpening halos as well. Without a doubt, the Fuji GFX 50S is way ahead of the Hasselblad X1D-50c in terms of its menu system, by leaps and bounds. Overall, feel free to print 8 x 10's all the way up to this ISO! NOTE: These images are from best quality JPEGs straight out of the camera (except for the Phase One XF 100MP which cannot produce in-camera JPEGs), at default settings including noise reduction and using the camera's actual base ISO (not extended ISO settings). Photos taken with the Fujifilm GFX 50R medium format mirrorless camera. There are options for those on a budget, as well as those who want the best optical quality. The Pentax on the other hand produces much better contrast in our red-leaf swatch but it renders the pink fabric much too magenta. Below are crops from our laboratory Still Life target comparing the Fuji GFX 50S' image quality to the highest resolution challengers we have tested to date: The 50-megapixel full-frame Canon 5DS R, the 51-megapixel medium format Pentax 645Z, the 101-megapixel medium format Phase One XF 100MP, and the 42-megapixel full-frame Sony A7R II Mark II. / Fuji 50/3.5 on GFX 100. In the shadows, a combination of noise and noise reduction processing reduces fine detail to a degree as well as displays a somewhat mottled appearance in some areas. Detail is excellent, and despite the increase in shadow/background noise, it's not likely to have a negative effect given the typical viewing distance for a print of this size. Colors are also slightly less vibrant. I am not sure if I just got unlucky with one of the sample units, but it could definitely be a concern for a potential owner. In shooting landscapes, you are almost always confronted with bright areas (sky) and dark areas (shadows in the foreground). The Hasselblad X1D-50c is a lightweight and stylish mirrorless camera with leaf shutter lenses. See more ideas about Fujifilm, Medium format camera, 50s. The right compartment is for video – it contains a microphone input and a headphone jack. Be aware the Phase One camera does not produce in-camera JPEGs, requiring the use of computer software (in this case we used Phase One's Capture One at default settings), so this is another reason this comparison is unfair but still interesting. Now considering that the smaller medium format sensor is only 167% as large as full-frame and yet it is 2-3 times as expensive compared to something like the Nikon D810, one wouldn’t get the same dollar per sensor inch value as say when moving from an APS-C to a full-frame camera. The Phase One also produces much better contrast in our tricky red-leaf swatch. When it comes to the EVF, many Fuji GFX 50S owners love its flexibility and modularity. Fuji left very little space on the top and the bottom of the camera, which shows that the engineers wanted to make the camera as compact as possible, obviously without any serious compromises. On the left side of the camera, you will see a battery door, along with two extra compartments for connectivity options. Sample Images GFX-50s, 1/250, f/2, ISO 100 – GF 110mm The advantage of the E-mount series is without a doubt the wider selection of lenses. The same goes for the rear dial – it just feels too small for this camera. Personally, I would prefer that Fuji engineers instead found a way to work out the battery size issue by perhaps making the camera grip a little larger and moving it there. prints are the largest we test. That’s because Fuji decided to place two buttons on this back grip (function button + “Q” button), so it had to come out a bit to prevent people from accidentally pressing those buttons. It might not have the sleek design and comfort of the X1D-50c, but given that it is a very functional tool aimed at fairly technical photographers who know what they are doing, I prefer the GFX 50S to the X1D-50c any day. Unlike the X-series cameras, the GFX 50S has way too many ridges and protruding elements all over its body and with an attached EVF (see additional notes on the EVF further down in the review) plus a boatload of buttons, it looks like a complex and possibly even an intimidating camera. On the positive note, the back LCD screen on the GFX 50S is wonderful, not just because of its large size and high resolution, but also because it is a tilting type. The difference is certainly visible in images, but it is very marginal. As you can see, the sensor on the Fuji GFX 50S (just like on the Pentax 645Z and the Hasselblad X1D-50c), is significantly smaller compared to the medium format sensor found on the Hasselblad H6D-100c. Color is still rich, and the prints still have nice contrast, but noise reduces fine detail in some lower-contrast areas, such as our notoriously tricky red fabric swatches. The grip protrudes way too much in my opinion, and its a bit too edgy, which made it somewhat painful to use in the field – my thumb kept getting sore on one side.